Quizgecko is strong when a quiz has to leave your hands and reach other people. This assumes the only person taking it is you, and everything follows from that.
Bigger sets read more of your document. Included with Student and Genius.
PDF, PowerPoint, Word, or a link · up to 10 MB · start without an account
Compared on what each tool does, not on what it markets. Checked August 2026; both products change, so verify anything that would decide it for you.
| The job | Quizgecko | GeniusPal |
|---|---|---|
| Who takes the quiz | Built for assessment that can be shared, assigned, and handed out. | One person, the account holder. Nothing can be shared or assigned. |
| Question types | Several, including short answer, true or false, and fill in the blank. | Multiple choice, flashcards, and written recall over one generated set. |
| Editing questions | Questions can be edited and curated before anyone sits them. | Not editable. A question you disagree with can be flagged, not rewritten. |
| What happens after a round | Results per attempt, oriented around reporting on who scored what. | Missed questions join a weak pile and come back in a review across all your sets. |
| Export and sharing | Quizzes can leave the tool and reach the people meant to sit them. | No export and no sharing. The set is studied where it was generated. |
Sharing, assigning, and collecting results are core there and entirely absent here. For a teacher, a tutor, or anyone setting work for a group, that alone decides it and nothing below is relevant.
Short answer, true or false, and fill in the blank all have their place, particularly for assessment. There are three study modes here, and the multiple-choice mode is the only one that resembles a conventional quiz.
Editing before anyone sits the quiz matters a great deal when the results count for something. Questions here are generated as written and can only be flagged, which is fine for self-testing and unacceptable for assessment.
A quiz nobody else will see does not need curating, formatting, or proofreading. That removes the step that makes assessment tools slow for a single reviser.
Results here attach to your account across every set you have ever generated, so the daily review draws on the whole library rather than reporting on one attempt.
A question you passed a fortnight ago returns to the weak pile. Assessment tools have no reason to do that; a revision tool has every reason to.
Weighing several quiz tools? Read our roundup of Quizgecko alternatives.
No, and if that is what you came for then this is the wrong tool and Quizgecko is the better answer. There is no sharing, no assigning, no class management, no results dashboard, and no export, so a generated set cannot leave the account that made it. Everything is built around one person testing themselves on their own material: the score is yours, the missed questions attach to your record, and the review draws from every set you have generated. A teacher assembling a paper needs to edit questions, distribute them, and see who scored what, and none of those exist here. Nothing about that is a roadmap item either, since the review mechanics depend on there being exactly one learner behind the answers, and a weak pile assembled from several people's mistakes would describe nobody in particular.
It is a real limitation and worth weighing honestly. Questions are generated as written and the only response available is to flag one you believe is wrong. The reason is a consequence of the audience rather than a technical gap: for a single reviser, the value is in getting 10 defensible questions in under a minute, and an editing step reintroduces exactly the curation work that made building a set yourself unattractive. Where editing genuinely matters is when other people will sit the quiz and the result counts, which is assessment rather than revision. Sets are screened before you see them for the patterns that let people score without knowing anything, which handles the common failure modes, but it is not the same as being able to fix a specific question you disagree with.
One generated set, worked three ways. The scored multiple-choice quiz runs on every plan and is the only mode that looks like a conventional quiz, with one defensible answer and three distractors drawn from neighbouring ideas in your own material. Flashcard mode flips the same questions as cards you rate yourself on. Written recall removes the options entirely and asks you to type the answer into an empty box, graded as missed, almost, or recalled. There is no true or false, no fill in the blank, and no short answer as a separate type, because each additional format splits the same set rather than deepening it. Flashcards and written recall need Student at $14.99 a month or Genius at $59.99 for a year, while the multiple-choice mode is on every plan including the free one.
Yes, and the scored quiz on it is the complete mode rather than a preview. A Free account generates 2 study sets from your own uploads, each marked with explanations and redrillable as many times as you like, with no payment card involved at any point. The allowance is on generations rather than features, and those 2 are granted once for the life of the account instead of resetting monthly, which is the honest catch and the point most people decide. Beyond it, Student carries 100 generations for $14.99 a month, and Genius runs a year for $59.99 under a fair-use ceiling of 1000 a month. Paid tiers also lift a set from 10 to 30 questions and add the two modes that are not multiple choice. There is no trial period on the paid plans, because the free generations already are one and they do not expire.