Your teacher decides what gets emphasised, which examples get used, and which definition you are expected to give. Upload their notes and the questions inherit all of it.
Bigger sets read more of your document. Included with Student and Genius.
PDF, PowerPoint, Word, or a link · up to 10 MB · start without an account
The department booklet your teacher wrote is closer to your exam than any generic revision app, because your teacher writes your mocks.
Upload the chapter rather than the summary page, so the questions reach past the material everyone else has already skimmed.
The most underused documents in sixth form. They state in words exactly what earns a mark, and they read cleanly as PDFs.
A paragraph of A-level physics notes, and the marked paper that comes back from them. Sample material, written by us to show the shape of the output.
Your class notes
Circular motion, class booklet page 12.pdf
An object in uniform circular motion travels at constant speed but is accelerating, because its direction is continuously changing. The resultant force acts towards the centre, and no force acts outwards on the object itself.
Your marked paper
Your score
8 of 10
3 of the 10 questions
How can an object moving at constant speed still be accelerating?
In which direction does the resultant force act in uniform circular motion?
Why is it wrong to say an outward force acts on an object moving in a circle?
Nothing pushes the object outwards. The sensation of being thrown out is the object continuing in a straight line while the surface curves away, so an outward force in a free-body diagram is a lost mark.
The two you missed come back on their own as a shorter round, and redrilling them spends no part of your allowance.
The scored quiz shown here runs on every plan, Free included, and each of the Free plan's 2 generations produces a complete one.
A PDF, a lecture deck, a Word document, a pasted link, or text typed straight into the box.
Not from a general model of your subject. Only from the document in front of it, which is what makes the questions match your module.
Questions you get wrong join a weak pile and return in the daily review. Mastery lapses after a fortnight, so nothing stays finished forever.
No, and this is the most important thing to understand before using it. It has never seen an AQA, OCR, Edexcel, or WJEC specification, holds no past papers, and knows nothing about grade boundaries or assessment objectives. What it does is read the document you upload and write questions about what is in it. In practice that gets you closer to your board than it sounds, because your class notes and department booklets were written by a teacher working from your specification, so the emphasis and the definitions are already board-shaped by the time they reach you. What it cannot do is warn you that a topic in your notes is no longer examined, or that something on your spec is missing from your notes. Cross-checking against the specification stays a job for you.
It writes multiple-choice questions from your material and, on a paid plan, written-recall prompts where you type an answer into an empty box. Neither is a reproduction of your board question style, which has its own conventions about command words, mark allocation, and how many points earn how many marks. The written-recall mode gets closest, because producing an answer from nothing is what a written paper actually asks of you, but it is graded against your source material rather than against a mark scheme. The honest recommendation is to use past papers for question technique, since nothing else teaches you what "evaluate" means to your examiner, and to use this for the layer underneath, which is making sure you can actually recall the content before you spend a past paper finding out that you cannot.
No. Generating practice questions from your own class notes and then testing yourself on them is a study method, in exactly the same category as a study group quizzing each other or a teacher setting a low-stakes test. Nothing is submitted, nothing is written for you, and no assessed work passes through it, because it produces questions rather than answers to hand in. The line to watch is the same one that applies to every AI tool in education: using it to produce work you then present as your own is an academic integrity problem, and that is a different activity from revising with it. If your school has a policy on AI, read it, and if you are unsure, the safe framing is that this is a self-testing tool and self-testing has never been the thing anyone objected to.
Want a revision plan too? Read our guide to revising for A-levels.